Representative Cases

The following are a representative sample of cases our team has worked on for our business litigation clients.

Software Development Dispute

Case Facts: Represented Plaintiff in dispute regarding a joint venture for the development of a new software service platform and whether one party had lived up to its obligations to develop the product.
Amount in Controversy: $500,000
Opposing Counsel: Quarles & Brady, LLP
Outcome: Confidential settlement

Engineering Services Dispute

Case Facts: Represented Plaintiff in dispute regarding payment for services in engineering work refurbishing a rail car and counterclaims of professional negligence.
Amount in Controversy: $345,000
Opposing Counsel: Lichtsinn & Haensel, S.C.
Outcome: Full verdict of $344,551.53 in Plaintiff’s favor after Jury trial.

Manufacturing Dispute

Case Facts: Represented Defendant in dispute regarding the manufacture and installation of heat dampers and a related fire.
Amount in Controversy: $250,000
Opposing Counsel: Crivello Carlson, S.C.
Outcome: Confidential settlement.

Commercial Printing Dispute

Case Facts: Represented Plaintiff in dispute regarding the commercial printing of scratch cards for a telephone promotion overseas.
Amount in Controversy: $2,000,000
Opposing Counsel: Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren, S.C.
Outcome: Plaintiffs claims were dismissed on statute of limitations grounds which was upheld on appeal to the 7th Circuit.

Landscaping Services Dispute

Case Facts: Represented Plaintiff in dispute regarding landscaping services provided and misrepresentations.
Amount in Controversy: $35,000
Opposing Counsel: Cramer, Multhauf & Hammes, LLP
Outcome: Full verdict of $145,755.25 in Plaintiffs favor which included actual attorneys fees.

AIA Construction Dispute

Case Facts: Represented Defendant with regards to construction of a day care and issues regarding cancellation, timeliness of performance, and environmental engineering issues.
Amount in Controversy: $150,000
Opposing Counsel: Husch Blackwell
Outcome: Confidential settlement

Minority Shareholder Dispute

Case Facts: Represented Defendant with regards to claims made of misappropriation of funds and breach of fiduciary duty to minority shareholder.
Amount in Controversy: $200,000
Opposing Counsel: Gende Law Offices
Outcome: Confidential Settlement.

Subcontractor Payment Dispute

Case Facts: Failure by prime contractor to pay subcontractor for work performed and paid by property owners. Claims for breach of contract and theft by contractor.
Amount in Controversy: $150,000
Opposing Counsel: Von Briesen & Roper, S.C.
Outcome: Confidential Settlement.

Software Development Dispute

Case Facts: Dispute regarding payment and scope of deliverables upon termination of software development contract.
Amount in Controversy: $550,000
Opposing Counsel: Foley & Lardner, LLP
Outcome: Case stayed and compelled to Arbitration